When asked whether the peace process can overcome opposition from Hamas, Bush said "the best way to defeat those terrorists and radicals ... is through a vision based upon liberty."
"Ultimately, if this can be done, if the state can be laid out -- what the state should look like -- then it gives people like President Abbas the chance to go to the Palestinians and say, 'You can have their vision of violence or this vision of peace, take your pick.' "
"America can't impose our vision on the two parties," Bush said.
"If that happens, then there's not going to be a deal that will last."
The title of the article reads: "U.S. cannot impose vision of peace on Mideast, Bush says." Then what have you been doing there since 2001? No, no country can or has teh right to impose anything on another country, but what has your country been doing? You've got a president killed, that either good or bad, it was not your problem to solve, no matter how you wish to approach the issue. So, you keep demanding billions of dollars for warfare, cutting social spending, pushing for an ongoing war no one wants anymore... and now you come and say, admit if you like, that the U.S. can't impose their vision on another country? Tell us all, I pray, then what for was all that money?
1 comment:
... that he resigns and leave the entire thing to someone actually capable to run a country? Like Duffy Duck?
Post a Comment